The A.B.C. Murders
Author: Agatha Christie
Year Published: 1935
Stars: 4/5
Synopsis:
Hercule Poirot and Captain Hastings have solved many, many murders together over the past years. Now, Hastings lives in South America and Poirot has long retired from the police force. One morning Poirot receives a letter taunting him to ‘step-in’ and solve a crime. The letter gives the location and date of the murder. Chalking it up as a hoax Poirot stashes the letter away until the murder actually occurs and he receives another letter. Now Poirot and Hastings must try and discover a pattern that exists in his victims to determine who will be next. Can Poirot still solve a case even though he has been retired for years or will the killer outsmart the man with all the grey matter?
Why I liked it:
My mom brought up an interesting point awhile back that made me appreciate Agatha Christie novels more. Some mystery authors cheat the ending of the story. And by cheat I mean the author reveals the killer as being the doorman we meet in chapter 3 and has one line. This is not only insanely frustrating but also makes me wonder how they ever got published. I have read quite a few Christie novels and not once did she ever cheat. She has written hundreds of novels and short stories each unique in content and ending. Considering she writes in the mystery genre, I have to give her props.
Another reason I love this, and all her novels, is that Poirot is not always right. It is infuriating to read a book when the main character is perfect and never makes a mistake. In this book…spoiler alert… Poirot gets sent 4 letters before he solves the crime, which means he was wrong at least 3 times. He is protrayed as human and fallible.
Last, she is just a good author. It is a fun, quick read that transforms you from your couch to rainy England instantly.
What I didn’t like:
The Hercule Poirot novels are all written through the eyes of Captain Hastings, Poirot’s faithful sidekick…which I like. However, Hastings has an unusually small role in this novel. In fact, I almost forgot he was the narrator about midway through. Hastings is smart and ‘has a tendency for stating the obvious’, which always leads to the case being solved. Therefore, even though the point is moot and no more Poirot novels will ever be written, I think Hastings should have had a larger role in the novel. Poirot is interesting but not very likeable. Hastings has a charismatic personality and often provides comic relief.
The other part I don’t like is that Poirot speaks French from time to time. It wouldn’t bother me if I spoke French, but since I do not, it is quite annoying.
Little Known Fact:
Her play, The Mousetrap, is the longest running theatrical play in history. Take that West Side Story and Cats!
Fun Fact:
Christie wrote two famous detectives, Miss Marple and Hercule Poirot; however, my favorite main character is Harley Quin. The Mysterious Mr. Quin, in my opinion, is her best book.
O'Hare Arpt., IL
Recent Comments